![The way of the ninja nv20](https://kumkoniak.com/93.jpg)
![the way of the ninja nv20 the way of the ninja nv20](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/czHxK4x4F0I/maxresdefault.jpg)
![the way of the ninja nv20 the way of the ninja nv20](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5QenOom0Zks/maxresdefault.jpg)
You're not wrong, and Nvidia is still making good money, but it's not showing in the share price. It tells us that, very likely, 7nm yields are not where they should be at the moment.Ĭlick to expand.This is primarily increased competition in automotive. But the 40 CU Navi is "Navi 10", and so likely the biggest AMD has planned.Īll of this shows a reluctance to move from TSMC's 16 FF process and AMD is likewise reluctant to move too much volume away from GloFo 14 nm. A big Navi (so 64 CUs) looks like it'd perform at RTX 2080 Ti levels or even above, with smaller silicon. Small Navi is in the RX 5500, but it seems AMD wants to continue Polaris 20 production to fill most of that space: RX 5500 XT doesn't beat an RX 580, but it's damn close. Nvidia needs to very quickly move beyond 2016's 16 nm process, while AMD needs to get big Navi and small Navi out there. People who're more price sensitive are basically buying RX 570s, which both undercuts the GTX 1650 and beats it across the board. If you want to go with the older generation RX 590, it's a little cheaper, but a little slower. RX 5700 is way above all the 1660s, and RX 5500 XT is below them. AMD doesn't actually have anything nearby. The retailers I see with 1660 SUPERs in are either low stocked or above MSRP (which is $229), so supply isn't matching demand. Right now, that's the 1660 SUPER (or the 1660 Ti if you want to spend 10-20% more for 5% more capability). The dominant GPU in volume, for machines expected to play games (so, Steam Hardware Survey) is always whichever one sits around $200-$250 and performs the best.
![The way of the ninja nv20](https://kumkoniak.com/93.jpg)